top of page

2

(nothing substantial)

7

(mild violence and monster terror)

5

(see once)

There's a monster in these here swamps. Nobody believes me, but you will. Yes, you will. When the blood is sapped from your body by the giant leeches you will believe! The local game warden knows something's up, but the poor, unimaginative sheriff is not letting him investigate because the whole notion is far too silly. In fact, the sheriff may just find him a human suspect to arrest.

 

"Attack of the Giant Leeches" gets a bad rap from a lot of people. While it certainly invites some harsh criticisms from any discerning movie patron, there are a few misguided souls out there, like me, that wonder why people hate it quite so much. It has an entertaining story, good characters, and some genuinely creepy moments. For an old black-and-white monster flick screaming out for a drive-in venue it rises up to be better than many of its peers even if only marginally so.

 

I guess I've seen too many horror movies. Whenever people are trying to convince the local authorities that some monster exists I can't help but wonder why it's so hard to believe. I have to force myself to remember that they are creating a link to reality. What real officer would outright believe in killer klowns from outer space or swamp monsters? But for some reason it's harder for me to understand why movie officers are so thick-headed. I guess it's just the way the characters react that fails to create a believable inability to believe.

 

This leads to a dynamic I like in "Attack of the Giant Leeches;" it gets away from the cliché of “crazy” teenagers trying to convince authorities. This time it’s a professional, a game warden, yet he still might as well be a know-nothing kid in the eyes of the authorities. For "Attack of the Giant Leeches" though, the battle between the game warden and the sheriff sells completely. In fact, their back-and-forth creates a lot of the best moments in the movie. Some people side with one or the other with a good narrative payoff towards the end. It was this conflict and the portrayal of it that drew me into the movie.

 

One thing that helps the suspension of disbelief is that the sheriff isn't just the icon of authority. While he does serve as that, he is also a real character. He clearly wants to do his job and who can blame him for not wanting to waste time on monster chases? We also get something beyond the scenes of teens tongue wrestling in a car only to be set upon by monsters. We get the plight of a town drunk desperate to tell what he knows and devastated at being ineffectual thanks to his chosen lot in life.

 

We also get a subplot of a beautiful cheating wife and her dumpy, good-natured husband that everyone thinks they can walk all over because he lacks the spine or wits to do anything about it. Watching the lives of these people intertwine with the monster story makes for good cinema.

 

The horrific moments vary. On the one hand we have the great setting of the swamp, ideal atmosphere for any horror story. The people trapped in the dank lair of the creatures is pretty creepy. Imagine finding yourself at the mercy of some horrific predator knowing that you're about to be cannibalized and that you're helpless to stop it.

 

On the other hand the creatures are standard rubber suit goofiness. Thankfully the director had enough sense to not show the "leeches" too much, but even less screentime might have helped. For one thing these look nothing like real leeches. I guess you could say "leech" is just a common term applied for lack of anything better, but don't expect a worm, not to mention they flop around like the suits they are which doesn't help sell their authenticity.

Morality

This is a pretty tame movie. I didn't notice any strong language.

 

The adulterous wife has some sexuality about her, but it never gets graphic or vulgar.

 

There is some life and death here such as people being killed and terrorized by the monsters, people being chased by a gun-toting madman, and suicide. As far as a horror movie goes it's nothing that stands out.

Spirituality

There is something of a message of “you reap what you sow” in this story even though it's not strongly presented, nor mentioned, nor scripted, nor existing anywhere but in my head. OK so maybe I'm stretching a little here, but take a look at the plight of the town drunk. He brings a warning that could save lives, but because he has flushed his credibility down the toilet he's tossed into the drunk tank without a second thought.

 

How about the adulterous wife? She pushes and pushes her husband thinking that he's never going to have the spine to respond. And what does he do? Ha! Like I'm going to tell you. The point is that she meets an unhappy fate because of her actions.

 

So, friends and readers, if you don't want to be eaten by giant leeches don't drink or cheat on your spouse.

Final Thoughts

I don't care what you know-nothing critics say even if you do get more reader traffic on your reviews, I like "Attack of the Giant Leeches!" In the realm of campy black-and-white drive-in monster horror this is a cut above the norm.

Buying Guide

Like many of these public domain movies there so many different releases of "Attack of the Giant Leeches" they could choke a giant leech.

 

There are numerous stand-alone DVD's and even more combos with a variety of other movies. I even found a Blu multi-pack. Just make sure you're getting the black-&-white classic rather than the newer one.

 

TheBlu pack is not HD, it just uses the storage capacity of Blu-ray to put a bunch of movies on a single disc.

 

There's no sense in me talking to you about other specific releases because they all look to be exactly the same. I can't find a single one that stands out as potentially being different from what I've already described. The only difference is that most specs list it as being in the 1.33 full frame ratio while my copy is widescreen (though non-anamorphic).

 

Final Recommendation:

The 50 pack offers a version of the film that is not only acceptable but actually probably as good as you're going to get without someone putting it through a remastering process which I haven't seen happen yet. I can tell you that the 50 pack is a bargain, but I'm sure some of those other copies will be decent as well.

I got mine in a pack of 50 Horror Classics.

 

Video

N-A widescreen:

The non-anamorphic widescreen image bugs me. It's presented in a 1.33 ratio but within that the image is matted to be widecreen so the effect is like watching the film through a small window, at least on a widescreen TV it is. Despite that, the quality is quite decent for a movie of this age. It's relatively clean though it's still a bit fuzzy and contains some trash.

Audio

2.0 mono:

The same applies to the audio, it's solid for such an old film. It's easy to make out all the dialogue.

 

Packaging

This particular disc is housed in a cardboard sleeve contained in a Velcro-fastened box. More recent editions come in plastic cases.

 

Extras

None

Other Releases Available:
Releases Reviewed:
Want to get your hands on something you read about? Click the links below.
bottom of page