top of page

2

(nothing substantial)

6

(some violence)

4

(see it if you really like vintage horror)

Does "The Brain That Wouldn’t Die" really have a cult following or was someone pulling my leg? I mean it’s better than getting kicked in the teeth but so is a wedgie. Well, maybe that’s debatable. The title is a little misleading, by the way. A better title would be “The Head That Couldn’t Die.”

 

The story is all about an unconventional doctor who has found a way to give life back to the dead. He is also on the verge of revolutionizing the field of transplantation. When his girlfriend is decapitated in an auto accident he revives her head keeping it alive in a blood solution with the help of his machines. That’s no way to live so he sets out to find a body for her. He will have to commit murder, but that’s a small price to pay for the life of his love.

 

He’s confident he can make the head transplant work. The problem is that the bodyless head is not the same person as the woman that died. I mean how traumatized would you feel if you were nothing more than a head on a platter? She doesn’t want to continue to live and she has developed the power to communicate with a caged, inhuman monstrosity that is the result of a previous experiment. She’ll use that power to put a stop to all this craziness.

 

If there’s one thing I can say good about this movie it’s that the disembodied head looks pretty good. They really did a good job of selling this as nothing more than a head on a pan. Of course it’s obvious that the actor’s body is hidden beneath the table, but the masking of that encasement is impressive. No green screen effects here, folks.

 

There’s a lot that’s not so impressive, though. For one thing a lot of the acting is not all that great. Even when it’s decent it falls too easily into the realm of cheesy. Another problem is that some of the scenes feel redundant. The worst of this is at the beginning when the doctor is arguing with his father over the concept of trying his new procedures on human subjects. His father thinks it’s wrong to “experiment” on humans. This argument goes on and on with virtually the same points made over and over. While not boring the acting and redundancy make the pace tedious and spoils what could have been good development or tension.

 

I guess some of the visual innovations were enough to earn this movie the respect of some, but I was hoping for more. Perhaps the plight of the living head touches some in more profound ways. She will use the powers she's developed to put an end to her suffering and stop her doctor boyfriend from carrying on with his experiments. She gets psychotic about it, but her pain does make her sympathetic. Similarly, the doctor, who does not appear at all to be a bad guy at first, allows his own pain to drive him to do evil against other people. It's an interesting dynamic.

Morality

This is more graphic than many movies of the black-and-white era. The whole plot revolves around a living disembodied head though we see no gore. A monster rips off a limb or two and bites a chunk out of someone. A couple of the moments are bloody.

 

There is a very small amount of strong language and perhaps a a little mild sensuality.

Spirituality

Pain makes life difficult. In the cases of these characters their pain drives them to desperate actions, sometimes even evil ones. The doctor is willing to inflict pain on others, by taking the life of an innocent woman, in order to satisfy his own desires. While his desires are not as dark as someone like the guy from "White Zombie" who wants to use dark magic to steal a pretty girl away from her fiance to be his own private love slave, it's still a dark heart that says, “I will murder you, someone to whom I have no emotional attachment, so that I can save someone I want to live.” Murder is murder, and the Bible doesn't say it's a sin depending on your girlfriend's head needing a new body.

Final Thoughts

Some fans swear by this black-and-white classic, but I don't see what all the fuss is about. It's not completely without merit, but there are other old horror movies that I've enjoyed a great deal more.

Buying Guide

You know I'm going to say it, so say it with me: like all the other old public domain classics "The Brain that Wouldn't Die" has a brain-slaughtering pile of releases out there. This one actually has a couple that stand out somewhat.

 

You can get this movie by itself on any number of over-priced DVD's. There is an “uncut” version, an Elvira hosted release, a shirt package, and any number of combo packs with various other movies including a Blu set.

 

All of the releases I found list the same specs which I've already talked about. None mention any remastering, and none list any extras beyond what I'll mention here. Even the Blu collection is the same. You're not getting any sort of HD remaster there.

 

The “uncut”version lists the same run time as all the rest of them so I really don't think you're going to get anything more for your money though I could certainly be wrong.

 

The DVDTee package gives you a shirt with your movie but doesn't appear to offer anything else.

 

Elvira hosts a double feature with "Manster." She appears to have created some comedy skits related to the movie. The set offers some extras, but they don't appear to be related to this movie in particular. The video for this film in particular is said to be off-center.

 

There is another Elvira double-feature with "Little Shop of Horrors." I'm guessing it's the same feature as the other release just packaged with a different film. I found no informative comments about it, though.

 

Final Recommendation:

Unless you like Elvira hosted movies there really isn't a release that's going to give you anything more than you can get out of the others as far as I can tell. Grab whatever bargain you stumble across. I've been pleased with the 50 pack.

Mine comes in a pack of 50 “Horror Classics” and appears to be the standard for quality of presentation. While I don't have any other copies for side-by-side comparisons, I've seen other versions and didn't notice any quality differences.

 

Video

1.33:

This is the TV standard “full-frame” ratio. It's not bad for such an old movie. It still has trash and a somewhat unclear image, but it's perhaps a bit above average compared to a lot of others I've seen.

Audio

2.0 mono:

The audio is also typical if maybe slightly above average compared to similar releases. It's clear enough to make out all the dialogue but still sounds dated.

 

Packaging

This particular disc is housed in a cardboard sleeve contained in a Velcro-fastened box. Later copies have been repackaged in plastic.

 

Extras

There are no extras of any kind.

Other Releases Available:
Want to get your hands on something you read about? Click the links below.
Releases Reviewed:
bottom of page