top of page

2

(nothing substantial)

7

(murder)

5

(see once)

"The Bat" is yet another Vincent Price classic (I'm kind of a fan if you didn't notice). As usual he turns in a commanding performance, but he is not the only good part of this movie. It is all around a good offering.

 

A bank robbery leaves a million dollars up for grabs if anyone has the wherewithal to figure out where it’s hidden. In the mix are a wily doctor (Price), a mystery writer (Agnes Moorehead who should be familiar to fans of classic TV) who happens to be renting the house that supposedly contains the stolen stash, and a mysterious killer who calls himself The Bat (kind of a Batman crossed with Catwoman type of guy but more murderous). With multiple people acting suspiciously, any one of whom could possibly be the killer in the Bat mask, the would-be treasure hunters don’t know who to trust.

 

The masked killer is vicious and relentless leaving bodies in his wake. He seems to easily thwart attempts to catch him and proves he’s delighted to kill anyone that crosses his path. The character of the Bat is actually a pretty good design. He wears black to blend in with the shadows, a mask to hide his face, and claw-like finger attachments that seem like they would get in the way but also provide good weapons. It’s campy, sure, but also somewhat practical in horror movie terms. Then again, maybe I’m just glad to have a bat motif rather than another monkey (which seems to be the only animal most black and white horror movies care to use).

 

The acting is largely quite good. It’s certainly not the best, but I liked most everyone. Price is the main draw for me, but there are other names here that might interest some viewers. I’ve already mentioned Moorehead who might be considered the star of this flick. It’s her mystery writer character that we spend the most time with, and she does a nice job with the role. I rather expected her to fall into the tired cliché of the screaming/fainting old lady. OK OK she’s not THAT old, I didn’t mean it like that.

 

While no one else can match these two in presence everyone carries themselves solidly. Each one suspected of being the Bat gives good reasons to generate suspicions but also provides reasonable explanations for their actions which creates a fun air of mystery.

 

There’s not much I will criticize here. It does seem to try too hard to create questions about who the Bat really is by creating suspicions and doubts to keep the viewer on their toes, but the uncertainty is part of the fun of the cinematic experience so I can forgive going overboard with it. Some of the scares are campy, but overall the atmosphere of the creepy old house is a good one. Secrets rooms are a staple of classic haunted house tales so naturally this one has some to offer, though it also makes the effort of providing a reasonable explanation.

Morality

While there is some depicted violence, and even a corpse or two, it’s quite mild. There’s no blood even if some of the crime scene descriptions sound pretty brutal.

 

There’s a little bit of very mild strong language and nothing sexual. It's mostly typical of a black-and-white horror movie.

Spirituality

There's not really any spiritual depth here. There is nothing supernatural in the events and no delving into any sort of religious motivation. All we really see is the love of money being the root of other evils.

Final Thoughts

This is well worth seeing if you like old black-and-white creepy house movies, especially if you like Vincent Price. It's not necessarily the absolute best around, but you could do a lot worse.

Buying Guide

"The Bat" has a number of DVD options available though fortunately not so many that it will drive you batty.

 

There are a few DVD options including several full-frame ones and a widescreen release or two with one of those being "restored." There's also a 2 pack with "House on Haunted Hill" also presented in widescreen. There are a variety of other multi-packs including a Blu set.

 

The full-frame releases are a dime a dozen. There's nothing special about any of them that I could see.

 

The first widescreen version offers a 1.85 ratio. It doesn't mention being remastered.

 

The restored Film Chest version offers 1.77 widescreen touted to be restored from HD elements. It does not list the audio specs or mention any extras.

 

The 2 pack, also listed as “Horror Classics, Vol. 3,” offers the same ratio and doesn't mention any remastering.

 

The Blu is not HD, it just uses the storage capacity of the format to fit a bunch of movies on a single disc.

 

Final Recommendation:

The Film Chest DVD sounds like the best bet as far as quality goes, but even the unrestored version in the 50 budget pack is relatively clean compared to a lot of these old movies. The Blu collection has a some good offerings, but don't expect Blu quality. Other than that, go with whatever good deal you find.

I got mine in a pack of 50 Horror Classics.

 

Video

1.33:

The ratio is the TV standard. The image is very grainy and is generally low quality, but it doesn't have much in the way of trash or other blemishes. Not that it's completely devoid of such elements, but it's not bad.

Audio

2.0 mono:

The audio has some persistent white noise, but it's otherwise fairly clear and easily understandable.

 

Packaging

This particular disc is housed in a cardboard sleeve contained in a Velcro-fastened box. Newer versions are packaged in plastic.

 

Extras

None

Other Releases Available:
Want to get your hands on something you read about? Click the links below.
Releases Reviewed:
bottom of page